jackofallgeeks: (Default)
[personal profile] jackofallgeeks
So, apparently, they've quietly removed
550 metric tons of uranium
from a site in Iraq -- so queitly, in fact, that the media burried the AP
article that was released over a week ago. Now, granted, the material they
removed isn't actual weapons-grade uranium, but it's a mediary step in the
process. I don't know, but I think something like this adds a little
credence to the original reasoning for the war, that Saddam was working to
manufacture weapons of mass destruction.

Date: 2008-07-15 07:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackofallgeeks.livejournal.com
That could certainly be the case, I won't argue otherwise without backing, but I'm more interested in why the media isn't saying anything about it, especially if there were hints that it wasn't on the up-and-up.

Date: 2008-07-15 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quix.livejournal.com
Hm. Perhaps because Iraq's WMDs are considered "yesterdays news"?

Profile

jackofallgeeks: (Default)
John Noble

August 2012

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 1st, 2025 01:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios