Just Musing

[jackofallgeeks]

This is
something that's bugged me from time to time, whenever I read about
International relations. To put a name to it, the fact that there seems to
be relatively few ways to actually enforce international 'rules.' The
article is talking about how the head of Sudan has been accused of war
crimes, but Sudan doesn't recognize the court that's making the
accusations. I believe it was Locke's view that international relations was
as close as modern man got to "the state of nature," which rather cynically
holds that brute force is the only true rule (might makes right, mostly
because who's going to stand up to you?).

Comments

[uhlrik.livejournal.com]

One of the issues with international law is that it often runs up against one of the biggest issues in international relations: sovereignty. Essentially, there are jurisdictional issues that are fundamental to the modern conception of the nation-state (dating back to the Westphalian Peace) that run counter to having such a thing as international courts interfering with individual governments / officers when they're acting within their own borders.