jackofallgeeks: (Contemplative)
[personal profile] jackofallgeeks
This may be worth noting. I'll keep my eyes open and let you know what comes of it. It comes down to competitive pricing, I think: iTunes is already offering DRM-free songs at a higher quality and correspondingly higher price -- generally, most people donm't care if the track is 128kbps or 320kbps, so whatever they say we're paying extra for DRM-free music. I think that Amazon could get away with lower-bitrate songs at a lower cost and beat out iTunes. Or they could play the same game and see how much people can be pressed for; the problem is, if it's no better for me to buy DRM-free from Amazon than from iTunes, why would I switch from the service I'm already using?

Date: 2007-05-16 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quix.livejournal.com
I use RealPlayer on my PDA, so the iTunes/Quicktime-codec doesn't work for me, and plus I have a large fondness for the MP3-codec. If this pans out, they'll have a customer from me, quick/fast/and in a hurry.

Profile

jackofallgeeks: (Default)
John Noble

August 2012

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 28th, 2025 06:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios