(no subject)
Apr. 25th, 2007 03:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png) jackofallgeeks
jackofallgeeksOne of the major problems I have with the way schools are run these days is that the rule used to measure success rewards things like discouraging students from taking challenging courses.  And that's shit.




![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-26 01:05 am (UTC)Hmmm, gee. :) Not that there's the tiniest thing wrong with choosing the other path, especially if you have a more natural ability with CS and math than I did -- and a much greater attention span. But you know, it turns out I just didn't love computers, and I absolutely hated not being able to dabble for fear of tanking my GPA. It would've been nice to take just one or two CS courses that weren't taught under a "cull the herd" mentality, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-26 05:24 am (UTC)truth be told, I ended up there accidentally -- when I couldn't find what I now know as a Linguistics Major in the English department, I thought, "hey, computers are cool," and very luckily took to coding like a fish to water. I was a little upset about not getting to dabble a bit more than I did, but that's mostly because I chose to get a minor in Philosophy and that took up a lot of my free slots.
The inept professors and culling mentality? Yeah, I hate it. It practically killed my program, too; the year I graduated, we had 3 juniors, no sophomores, and one freshman. My entering class had only had a couple dosen CS majors (I want to say), but only 6 of us graduated as such.