jackofallgeeks: (Default)
[personal profile] jackofallgeeks
Ok, for the sake of argument, I'll at least consider the possibility that, as investigators quoted in This article claim, there may be legitimate uses of 'pretexting' -- frankly, I prefer the terms 'lying' or 'deception', but those are emotionally-charged. Notably, though, it's never stated in what ways this is needed. Can anyone out there explain why anyone should have to lie outright to get personal information, and how there isn't some less-deceitful way of obtaining the same information? The only end that grabs me as legitimate at all is the missing child bit, but even then I've never been a fan of 'ends justify the means' ethics.

Thoughts?

Date: 2006-12-02 04:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uhlrik.livejournal.com
The road to Hell is paved with good intentions, and this is so because the means justify the ends rather than the reverse.

but then, I don't believe there is ever such a thing as a shade of grey in morality. Our human myopia is what causes us to blur the distinctions.

Profile

jackofallgeeks: (Default)
John Noble

August 2012

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 18th, 2025 09:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios