(no subject)
Apr. 21st, 2006 11:34 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I subscribe to Popular Science and Scientific American (and if anyone out there has suggestions, I'm looking for philosophy, mathematical, or psychology based perioticles as well), and there were some interesting gems in there this month. The first was that expecting to be disappointed (and being disappointed) is more disappointing that being positive (and being disappointed). There was an interesting theory about faster-than-light travel based around negative energy, and a bit about possible weapons-grade lasers by 2015.
Really, though, I was most interested by the disappointment thing, since common wisom says that if you expect to fail, it won't be as bad when you do.
And now I run to class.
Really, though, I was most interested by the disappointment thing, since common wisom says that if you expect to fail, it won't be as bad when you do.
And now I run to class.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-21 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-21 07:59 pm (UTC)I'd much rather expect for good things to happen. It allows for a much better frame of mind and enjoyable perspective the majority of the time.
Jess occasionally touts the 'I'd rather expect to be disappointed' mantra and it rarely fails to frustrate me. Happy people create happier circumstances! It's as simple as that!
no subject
Date: 2006-04-21 08:29 pm (UTC)I tried looking, and there seem to be no decent psychology magazines out there. There are the really high tech ones aimed at professionals, and then there are ones that are entire magazines filled with crap like consumer surveys and quizzes that are often flakier than some found on livejournal.