Because it amuses me so...
May. 25th, 2005 03:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A thorough analysis. Unquestionable truths. ambereternal is WAAAY more progressive. (JackOfGeeks's max: 8.8% ...ambereternal's min: 53.5% ...at least 44.7% different) ambereternal is greedier. (JackOfGeeks's max: 38.9% ...ambereternal's min: 57.2% ...at least 18.3% different) ambereternal is more independent. (JackOfGeeks's max: 80% ...ambereternal's min: 81.6% ...at least 1.6% different) ambereternal is MUCH kinkier. (JackOfGeeks's max: 7.4% ...ambereternal's min: 45.8% ...at least 38.4% different) JackOfGeeks is lonelier. (ambereternal's max: 41% ...JackOfGeeks's min: 47.1% ...at least 6.1% different) JackOfGeeks is MUCH more loving. (ambereternal's max: 67.7% ...JackOfGeeks's min: 88.7% ...at least 21% different) JackOfGeeks is WAAAY more old-fashioned. (ambereternal's max: 34.4% ...JackOfGeeks's min: 91.2% ...at least 56.8% different) JackOfGeeks is WAAAY more pure. (ambereternal's max: 40.9% ...JackOfGeeks's min: 83.2% ...at least 42.3% different) JackOfGeeks is MUCH more Republican. (ambereternal's max: 58.1% ...JackOfGeeks's min: 87.5% ...at least 29.3% different) JackOfGeeks is less hesitant. (ambereternal's max: 27.6% ...JackOfGeeks's min: 36.2% ...at least 8.7% different) ambereternal is WAAAY more sex-experienced. (JackOfGeeks's max: 24% ...ambereternal's min: 75.8% ...at least 51.8% different) ambereternal is WAAAY hornier. (JackOfGeeks's max: 15.4% ...ambereternal's min: 57.9% ...at least 42.5% different) ambereternal is less methodical. (JackOfGeeks's max: 32% ...ambereternal's min: 45.9% ...at least 13.9% different) JackOfGeeks is less emotional. (ambereternal's max: 27% ...JackOfGeeks's min: 44% ...at least 17% different) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Link: See the comparison with sweet graphs. Individuals: JackOfGeeks and ambereternal. Created by Harvard math grads: OkCupid - Free Online Dating. |
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 05:15 am (UTC)*loves Alyce*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 01:32 am (UTC)Third one over's nice too.
I take it you have to be part of that OK Cupid thing to do one of these comparison thingummies?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 05:17 am (UTC)And yeah -- you have to be part of OKCupid to have a profile to compare against, and you won't get very solid results until you've asked a bunch of their quiz-type-questions; how else would they know anything about you?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 10:44 am (UTC)But maybe that's just me.
much luv,
@}'~Tina
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 12:16 pm (UTC)I'm never gonna wake you up
=P
no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 11:14 pm (UTC)