![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Little Thoughts
Dec. 17th, 2005 04:30 pmReading the first Harry Potter book again, in an attempt to actually read the whole series (such as it is currently).
Rowling described her goblins as short, swarthy-faced and with pointed beards and long fingers and feet. It reather upsets me, this description being given, that the movies portrayed "typical" goblins.
I also get the impression that Neville's a more important character than the movies would imply; if this is true, I think it's a plus. it's reasonable, though, for movies to cut down on primary characters.
That's the most pertinent thing I have to post currently. Aside from the fact that I'm really hungry. And I love my cousins.
Rowling described her goblins as short, swarthy-faced and with pointed beards and long fingers and feet. It reather upsets me, this description being given, that the movies portrayed "typical" goblins.
I also get the impression that Neville's a more important character than the movies would imply; if this is true, I think it's a plus. it's reasonable, though, for movies to cut down on primary characters.
That's the most pertinent thing I have to post currently. Aside from the fact that I'm really hungry. And I love my cousins.
