Drudgery

Nov. 18th, 2002 10:43 pm
jackofallgeeks: (Literary)
[personal profile] jackofallgeeks
He sat himself at the table, his muscles groaning in relief, as she buisied herself at the fire. A large pot was hung over the flames, boilling a milky-colored stew. It was probably goat again.

The rain beat against the windows as she dished out the stew, her ladle clinking dully, first against the pot and then against each of the stone-work bowls.

"The wooden shingles leak over in the corner." She said flatly, motioning with her head.
"You'll need to fix them."
'When we have the money' was left implied.

She placed the heavy-smelling bowl infront of him and then took her own seat. The iron spoon, smooth and bent by years of use, slid familiarly into his hand.

He would tell her about the oxen tomorrow.

Looks good yo...

Date: 2002-11-19 10:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serenabuny.livejournal.com
Watch in your writing for repetitions. Like "stew". We know what it is now, so develope its image as a stew by using others descripters. Watch out for using "was" too much. It clutters up the writing and slows down the pace. Cut out other clutter words that aren't necessary unless being used style-wise and watch for empty qualifiers like "really" and "very". Not that you used any of those, but keep an eye out for them. And use strong verbs "motioning with her head"-> "jerking her head towards the corner". With this you could cut out " over in the corner." And when you say "wooden shingles" in this same sentence, it implies that some of the shingles are made of other materials, and only the wooden ones leak. Is this what you're trying to say? They must be living in a run down house that used to be nice if they have wooden shingles. Most poor people would use thatching because wood's expensive... Keep up the writing! Love and huggles!...

Some Criticism - I like it.

Date: 2002-11-19 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackofallgeeks.livejournal.com
You make a good point on the over-use (if you can call twice 'over-use') of 'stew.' I may try and fix that. I also agree with your comment on 'was' and may try to clean that up, as well. it's always good to watch for meaningless words, 'really' and 'very' included, though I'm not sure what you mean by 'clutter words.' I really like your use of 'jerking' in place of my 'motioning,' and may make that substitution as well.

As for cutting out 'in the corner,' I'm afraid that's what she said, and I would sooner change my narration around than take her words from her. Along similar lines, and as it pertains to your speculation on the use of 'wooden shingles' -- I would but ask that you pay attention to what the author does say, and not so much question if he meant to say it. Definitely present your observations, as the author may not have intended to say what you read, but at the same time - perhaps the implication that this couple lives in a run down house that was once good says something important. It's been pointed out to me that if something stands out in a work, the author is most likely trying to draw it out. Think on it for a bit.
As mundane and perhaps obvious as my writing may seem, I like to think that, with a bit of though, deeper themes can be found it them.

On a finishing note, I much appreciate your criticism. I don't claim to be a renowned writer, and Lord knows I don't put these up for my health (though I will say it's all quite enjoyable).

Re: Some Criticism - I like it.

Date: 2002-11-19 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serenabuny.livejournal.com
I'd just like to say that I'm critiquing this from a purely creative standpoint. I don't know what he or she said, and I'm going to pretend that you created all of this. Otherwise it's ridiculous. If you want that edge of critiquing, lemme know what quotes and such you're working with.

Clutter means, in the most basic sense, words that clutter your writing. Words that can be deleted and have no real substancial purpose. Excluding dialogue, words like very, really, and quite just repeat what you're syaing. This doesn't mean you can't use them, but make sure they're used infrequently and used on purpose by the author.

"I would but ask that you pay attention to what the author does say, and not so much question if he meant to say it. Definitely present your observations, as the author may not have intended to say what you read, but at the same time - perhaps the implication that this couple lives in a run down house that was once good says something important. It's been pointed out to me that if something stands out in a work, the author is most likely trying to draw it out. Think on it for a bit.
As mundane and perhaps obvious as my writing may seem, I like to think that, with a bit of though, deeper themes can be found it them."

I can in no way find deeper meaning in this writing. It's too short and lacking on solid verbs for me to get a firm grasp of what's going on beyond the Exact words that you write. A reader typically does not just read exactly what you write, but uses their imagination and expands the image. If a work does not seem to stretch outside the walls of the room/place and leave some mystery to it, it's no good. There IS a wrold beyond that room and the reader wants to feel that. As far as meaning to say something, I HAVE to question it in this early a stage of writing. It's my fecking job. As long as I know why you want it that way, and develope it so that it's understandable to the reader, then it's ok. In such a short piece, with so little pattern or recurring theme to pick up, how am I supposed to expand and find deeper meaning in it? I can't find any words or images that repeat to emphasize a feeling of conflict, poverty, or whatever it is you're trying to show. Develope it more or piece it with something else. Right now all I can see is that they're in times of trouble, are poor, and are growing to be harsh, spiritless people...

Date: 2002-11-19 06:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackofallgeeks.livejournal.com
Ouch, that felt a bit harsh. I hope you didn't take offence at my reply.
First of all, I said I liked your critique, so please don't feel as though I was in any way attacking you. I wasn't. I am doing this creatively, there are no 'quotes' that i'm working with, strictly speaking, but... ::Shrugs:: I just meant to say that I wanted her to say what she said, is all.

As for the deeper meaning I may imagine there is in my writing...
Maybe I do just imagine. ::Shrugs:: It doesn't matter. I never claimed to be any good at this, and so if you can't see beyond my four walls, maybe it is a failing in my writing.
I still enjoy it.

Och...

Date: 2002-11-19 06:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serenabuny.livejournal.com
But I did feel rather attacked. I'm touchy and I felt like you were rebuking me for something I have a solid grasp on. Anyway... Now that I know you're not working with quotes, don't get too attached to phrases ^^. It's all right, but it's sounds un-natural really. Too wordy for such a simple message... And I think you can take those deeper messages and put them in your writing, just make them more obvious to the reader. You can do it, you have the skills. Just gotta start asking yourself questions and read it with a detached feeling. You have to pretend you've never read it or anything like it before, yes? And I DO really like you work ^^. You've got ideas, we just need to work on shaping words so they're expressed so others feel what you do, yes? We're all amateurs here, we all need to dvelope our writing skills. Hell, I suck, but still like my writing. I'm just trying to use what I know to help make your work more publishable for large audiences... Love your work ^^...

Date: 2002-11-21 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nif.livejournal.com
Ok, Andrew, I'm digging the scenes you've got going on. And I know you didn't ask for my advice or anything, so if you don't want it just stop reading here. If you're still with me, then I give the warning that I'm a very blunt critic, because the world is a very blunt critic and its only fair. Anyhow, now that you're scared and all, I will point out the good things I see, I'm going to stay focused on the Drudgery one since thats what sparked such a debate with you and Claire.

First off, I liked it and this is why: it was descriptive- the audience wasn't left floating in space, it had something ordinary the reader could identify with, and it hinted that there was more going on in the scene than first realized. However, that something was never really brought out. Just as the reader was enticed into the message beneath the surface you ended it.

The language was good, but it seemed a bit forced as if you sat and thought about the descriptors for a while. Some of it doesn't flow, and when details don't flow, it creates a "bump" in the reading and takes away from the point of using all that imagery. I don't know if you realize it, but you're describing only from a narrative standpoint, not as the characters are viewing things. This alienates the reader from the character. If the characters are only supposed to be allegorical symbols, thats fine, but if you want them to be *people* then you need to get the reader inside their heads.

Alright. So. To illustrate, this is how I would have done the scene if I had written it. Its not to say that my style is better than yours, but its just to give you a different take on it. Maybe you can identify an aspect that you'd like to incorporate, or one you'd like to stay away from. I dunno. I'm trying to help. Here goes.

Drudgery de la Nif

There was a drip in the corner of the room. The rain water had snaked its way through the meager wooden shingles, invading the little insular world.

There were days he thought the workload would get the best of him and he'd be left with nothing. With not even this rough hewn eating table he'd built with his own hands.

His muscles protested the shift as he sat down heavily, palms flat against the fire-warmed wood. He tried to focus only on the crackle of the fire and the gentle liquid sounds of stew being stirred. It was goat as it always was these days. The leak seemed to tap louder now as the droplets spattered on the hard packed floor.

She had seen the weariness on his face and knew as well as he that the storm had caused problems today. She wondered if the oxen were alright, but found she couldn't bring herself to really care. The ladle tapped against the cold stone of the bowls, mimicking with precision that ever present leak.

He twitched as he heard it but said nothing and she laid the bowl on the oversized table. She sat carefully across from him, and stared at her own bowl. They were quiet, the rain unobtrusive except for the tiny insidious drops that worked their way in.

"The wooden shingles leak over in the corner." It was a sharp statement, and unnecessary. "You'll need to fix them." She hadn't touched her stew.

He closed his eyes, shoving a spoonful of burning liquid into his mouth, and listened as the rain ate away at his home.

He would tell her about the oxen tomorrow.

Profile

jackofallgeeks: (Default)
John Noble

August 2012

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 10th, 2025 10:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios