-laughs- That's precicely *not* one of the things that interested me and, actually, not how I read the article, either. To me, it seemed to be saying, "most money is going to special-ed, most special-ed is boys, so girls are getting gypted." Then, "oh, wait, girls graduate more often and with higher scored than boys. So that's good, right?" And finally, "but wait, we still make less money!" I only got through 1/2 to 3/4 of the article, but she'd need to take a sharp turn pretty close to the end for me to hear "girls need to do worse in school, for the sake of the boys."
no subject
Date: 2006-08-03 02:49 pm (UTC)