John Noble (
jackofallgeeks) wrote2008-03-11 03:23 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
It's a Gun.
So, Here is
an article dealing with the case of a highschool student who got two days of
detention for wearing a particular T-shirt (or, specifically, for not
turning the t-shirt inside out to hide it's message) and the family who is
suing the school district over it.
The offending t-shirt showed the image of a military-issue pistol and had
the words "Volunteer Homeland Security," "Special Issue Permit No. 91101"
and "Terrorist Hunting Liscence" on it. A bit more enthusiastic for my
tastes, and the references to Homeland Security and 'terrorist hunting' make
me a little uneasy, but generally a clever and harmless t-shirt, I'd say.
The shirt was given to the boy by his uncle, who is currently serving in
Iraq, and the boy wore it in his honor.
The school apparently asked him to turn the shirt inside out and when he
didn't gave him two days of detention. That's pretty severe for wearing a
t-shirt, even one with a message you maybe disapprove of, and some might
argue it's a violation of the boy's constitutional right to free speach.
That's exactly what the boy's parents (and their lawyer) are arguing in
their suit.
The school has apparently made the defence that they need to keep kids safe
in a time when school shootings are occuring at such a rate that some of us
hardly notice them any more. And while this is probably true... I mean,
look at the facts here. A kid got two days of detention for wearing a
t-shirt that *showed a gun*. The mere *image* of a gun is dangerous to
students? Nevermind that the t-shirt is patriotic and no less aggressive to
American citizens than the Homeland Security it references. It's a T-SHIT
for cripes' sake.
What we have here is a case of zero-tolerance towards guns taken to such an
extreme that we're to the point of zero-tolerance towards their very image.
And zero-tolerance often translates to zero-common-sense. It's just dumb
and, to be honest, this sort of stuff really gets nder my skin.
an article dealing with the case of a highschool student who got two days of
detention for wearing a particular T-shirt (or, specifically, for not
turning the t-shirt inside out to hide it's message) and the family who is
suing the school district over it.
The offending t-shirt showed the image of a military-issue pistol and had
the words "Volunteer Homeland Security," "Special Issue Permit No. 91101"
and "Terrorist Hunting Liscence" on it. A bit more enthusiastic for my
tastes, and the references to Homeland Security and 'terrorist hunting' make
me a little uneasy, but generally a clever and harmless t-shirt, I'd say.
The shirt was given to the boy by his uncle, who is currently serving in
Iraq, and the boy wore it in his honor.
The school apparently asked him to turn the shirt inside out and when he
didn't gave him two days of detention. That's pretty severe for wearing a
t-shirt, even one with a message you maybe disapprove of, and some might
argue it's a violation of the boy's constitutional right to free speach.
That's exactly what the boy's parents (and their lawyer) are arguing in
their suit.
The school has apparently made the defence that they need to keep kids safe
in a time when school shootings are occuring at such a rate that some of us
hardly notice them any more. And while this is probably true... I mean,
look at the facts here. A kid got two days of detention for wearing a
t-shirt that *showed a gun*. The mere *image* of a gun is dangerous to
students? Nevermind that the t-shirt is patriotic and no less aggressive to
American citizens than the Homeland Security it references. It's a T-SHIT
for cripes' sake.
What we have here is a case of zero-tolerance towards guns taken to such an
extreme that we're to the point of zero-tolerance towards their very image.
And zero-tolerance often translates to zero-common-sense. It's just dumb
and, to be honest, this sort of stuff really gets nder my skin.
no subject
It wasn't ME who was comparing the two, but your average kid who figures the longer he debates about his shirt, the less time I'll have to teach him about the 8 main taxonomic ranks. Because he doesn't care a bit about that!
One thing I want to say about our school, and perhaps schools in general as I doubt that our school is coming up with any ground breaking ideas ... we have begun to recognize that some kids will never do well in school. It doesn't mean they are failures, it just means they can't cut it there, and never will. We now have a couple programs in place that allows these students to go to work instead of coming to school. They are still getting their school credits, and they will graduate, but not in the academic environment that some of them struggle against. Most of them are now excelling at their jobs and their lives. So, we are teaching them to succeed rather than fail and fail and fail.
We need more of that and less of the other side of the coin, which is the ones who don't finish school because they go to jail instead.
You agree with my corrected statement because the way I wrote it the first time was wrong. Breaking the rules is about disagreeing with them. Following the rules is a different story.
And, you touched on a point I meant to make earlier as well. Many TEACHERS need these rules even worse than some students!!
As far as your original example, again, we do not know if this is this student's first and only offense. I doubt he would have been suspended if this is the first trouble he ever got into. These offenses do compile, with a more severe punishment the more record there is.
Wow, my reply is all over the place this time. Sorry...
no subject
Sorry.
End rant.
no subject
We scaffold, we build them up, we help them out. Whatever it takes. Some don't appreciate it and never will, but the ones who grow makes it all worth it.