jackofallgeeks: (Decepticons)
John Noble ([personal profile] jackofallgeeks) wrote2006-09-27 09:52 am

DaVinci

Leonardo DaVinci is one of my heroes. A fellow southpaw, he was also (forgive the pun) a true Renaissance Man; it's a shame, I think, that he's pretty much only known as a painter. He was also a sculptor, a mathematician, a swordsman, a scientist of several stripes, and an inventor. Mercifully, he's often recognized as designing helicopters and tanks and other things far advanced for his time. Here's an Article about how his magnificent Mona Lisa is even more magnificent that we knew.

[identity profile] nif.livejournal.com 2006-10-02 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if you've read The DaVinci Code or not. (If not, then don't waste your time.) But. It did have some very interesting ideas on the Mona Lisa in particular as well as the Last Supper. I'm no art expert and I can't say that I've looked into any of Dan Brown's assertions, but they seem pretty plausible. For instance, that the Mona Lisa is so titled as a veiled reference to Amon-- the Egyptian god of male fertility, yet her second name is clearly feminine. The book argues that she's supposed to be hermaphroditic as a testament to DaVinci's disagreement with male supremacy. And in the Last Supper, the figure seated on Jesus' right hand, says Brown, is actually female and therefore is Mary Magdalene, the true person whom Jesus wanted to carry on his teachings. He says the Peter figure is actually making a stabbing motion in the painting at Mary Magdalene. I think it's all very intriguing. I just hated the actual DaVinci Code book. I can't believe I gave in to the hype.

[identity profile] jackofallgeeks.livejournal.com 2006-10-02 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
Ha. No, I didn't read the DaVinci code. Firstly because I wasn't overly enthused by the subject matter, secondly because I hear it was horridly written, and third because I felt insulted that Brown would insinuate DaVinci into his conspiracy theory. I've heard "angels and Demons" in a lot better, but I'm not really interested in that, either.

As far as the points you bring up, I do think they're interesting to think about, but I think they're rather far-fetched, too. -shrugs- I donno. The sorts of things I want to write about are pretty wild ideas, too (though I think mine have more of a historical backing than Brown's), but... -shrugs-