Quote of the Day

[jackofallgeeks]

Prester Scott: People who can only think of sexuality when they think of love are beneath contempt.

I just wanted to point out that, yes! Love does not have to be sexual to be real and meaningful, and the one does not imply the other. This is a point that I hold to, and try to convey. Love does not have to be erotic.

Comments

[nif.livejournal.com]

Two things:

1. Sex without love is just another lifestyle, and who am I to judge the way someone else chooses to use his body or the body of someone who would willingly submit to that. Besides, we can always return to the old debate of what constitutes love. Just live and let live.

2. I have to seriously disagree with the generalization of metrosexuals who are firstly, heterosexual by definition, and secondly not always self-possessed or promiscuous. Just to clarify, I don't mean to nitpick, but to say "the metrosexual side of gay culture" is both redundant and contradictory because the term itself is used to describe straight men who act stereotypically "gay".

Oh, and Andrew, I have a new cell number in case you should be interested.

[jackofallgeeks.livejournal.com]

1) Well, we already know that I, at least, believe that there are things which are objectively good or bad, and though I'll admit I don't know them all, and i'll never know all the factors of anyone's life aside my own (if that), there are things which I believe are damaging and should be avoided. This is, simply put, one of those things. Of course, I never expect anyone to take my opinion as more than it is, an opinion; it
s just something I hold to.

2) *points to Kincaid* That's all his doing. -laughs- Culture terms like 'metrosexual' are beyond my sphere.