John Noble (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
jackofallgeeks) wrote2003-12-27 03:10 pm
jackofallgeeks) wrote2003-12-27 03:10 pm
Quote of the Day
Prester Scott: People who can only think of sexuality when they think of love are beneath contempt.
I just wanted to point out that, yes! Love does not have to be sexual to be real and meaningful, and the one does not imply the other. This is a point that I hold to, and try to convey. Love does not have to be erotic.
I just wanted to point out that, yes! Love does not have to be sexual to be real and meaningful, and the one does not imply the other. This is a point that I hold to, and try to convey. Love does not have to be erotic.
no subject
(Although, I must say - erotic love is a wonderful thing. It would be less wonderful, certainly, were the "love" bit not a part of the equation - but when it is... ::nods::)