Apr. 7th, 2008

jackofallgeeks: (Default)
So, recently there was a horror/suspense movie in theatres called "The Eye," which apparently had as
it's premise a combination of cellular memory and psychic phenomenon. In
the movie, a girl who has an eye transplant (I didn't know that sort of
thing happened) starts to see how people will die shortly before they do,
and presumably learns that the eye's donor had similar powers. I never saw
the movie, but it looked interesting and Cellular Memory is an
actual medical phenomenon. People have taken up smoking habits, speech
mannerisms, and behavioral quirks of their donors after recieving
transplants. Fascinating.

This morning one of the first articles I found was on a guy who killed
himself the same
way his donor did
. Now the article doesn't get too specific, basically
the guy shot himself and if the only similarity in their suicides is "death
by bullet wound," that's a pretty tenuous link. Still, it gets weirder when
they say that this guy had previously married his donor's widow. In
an interview with the guy in 2006 (I think), he said that when he met her
(after corresponding with his donor's family to offer his thanks) it was
like he'd known her for years. The point is, he kind of did; his heart
remembered her. And, apparently, it also remembered whatever demons plagued
it's original owner, and the method and motivation that owner had for
silencing those demons.
jackofallgeeks: (Write)
[A clipping from the Chicago Tribune, dated July 9th, 2036.]

The machine had been invented a few years ago: a machine that could tell, from just a sample of your blood, how you were going to die. It didn't give you the date and it didn't give you specifics. It just spat out a sliver of paper upon which were printed, in careful block letters, the words "DROWNED" or "CANCER" or "OLD AGE" or "CHOKED ON A HANDFUL OF POPCORN." It let people know how they were going to die.

The problem with the machine is that nobody really knew how it worked, which wouldn't actually have been that much of a problem if the machine worked as well as we wished it would. But the machine was frustratingly vague in its predictions: dark, and seemingly delighting in the ambiguities of language. "OLD AGE," it had already turned out, could mean either dying of natural causes, or shot by an bedridden man in a botched home invasion. The machine captured that old-world sense of irony in death — you can know how it's going to happen, but you'll still be surprised when it does.

The realization that we could now know how we were going to die had changed the world: people became at once less fearful and more afraid. There's no reason not to go skydiving if you know your sliver of paper says "BURIED ALIVE." The realization that these predictions seemed to revel in turnabout and surprise put a damper on things. It made the predictions more sinister — yes, if you were going to be buried alive you weren't going to be electrocuted in the bathtub, but what if in skydiving you landed in a gravel pit? What if you were buried alive not in dirt but in something else? And would being caught in a collapsing building count as being buried alive? For every possibility the machine closed, it seemed to open several more, with varying degrees of plausibility. By that time, of course, the machine had been reverse engineered and duplicated, its internal workings being rather simple to construct, given our example. And yes, we found out that its predictions weren't as straightforward as they seemed upon initial discovery at about the same time as everyone else did. We tested it before announcing it to the world, but testing took time — too much, since we had to wait for people to die. After four years had gone by and three people died as the machine predicted, we shipped it out the door. There were now machines in every doctor's office and in booths at the mall. You could pay someone or you could probably get it done for free, but the result was the same no matter what machine you went to. They were, at least, consistent.

Letter from the Editor )


jackofallgeeks: (Default)
John Noble

August 2012

   12 34

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 26th, 2017 10:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios